Should Divorced Couples Be Chained for Six Months?

April 8, 2023

Divorce is expensive. I used to joke they were going to call it 'all the money', but they changed it to 'alimony’. It's ripping your heart out through your wallet.” - Robin Williams (1951- 2014), American actor and comedian.

Divorce is not a comedy but a tragedy for all involved – the concerned couple, children if any, and the families/friends on both sides. Once the marriage is irreparably broken, divorce is the way out to cut the losses in the briefest time possible. But, the couple is expected to wait for six months under the present law in India for the divorce granted by court to take effect as reflected in the following recent report where the issue of pointless wait is focused on.

The Punjab and Haryana high court has held that if a married couple has decided to part ways amicably, they cannot be denied the opportunity to live their lives in the manner they like. According to the high court, in such circumstances, insisting that they wait for another six months to get a divorce would result in adding to their woes.

Justice Arun Menon passed these orders while allowing a revision petition filed by a couple challenging the order dated September 30, 2021, passed by the Panchkula family court whereby their plea for waiver of the statutory period of six months filed in a petition for divorce with mutual consent was dismissed.

The facts of the case are that the couple was married in February 2019 but due to temperamental differences, they started living separately from March 20, 2020.

Having failed to reconcile despite efforts, the parties filed a joint petition for the dissolution of their marriage by way of mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act before the family court. All the disputes pertaining to their matrimonial life had already been amicably settled between the parties.

Both the parties moved an application for waiver of the statutory period of six months, but the family court in September 2021 dismissed it. Aggrieved, the couple approached the HC on the issue.

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the lower court had not appreciated the facts and circumstances of the case in the right perspective while declining waiver of the period of six months. The contention was that once the parties have amicably consented to part their ways, they cannot be forced to wait for another six months.

During the hearing of the case, the high court personally interacted with the parties and observed that they are well aware of their rights. “They have very consciously taken steps to mutually part ways in the interest of a better future and a happier disposition in life. In the premise, no useful purpose would be served to unnecessarily force them to wait for six months, particularly, when the said wait may turn out to be adversarial qua the future prospects of the co-petitioner wife, with whom I have interacted and on a court query she has confidently stood by her first motion. In her own better interest, she has thus consciously chosen to take divorce and even otherwise her marriage is irretrievably broken down. No useful purpose would be served to continue in such a marriage. The co-petitioner husband also endorses her views and has given his consent for grant of mutual divorce by dissolving the marriage,” observed the HC while waiving off the six-month mandatory period of separation.

While setting aside the lower court’s decision, the HC ordered the principal judge, family court, Panchkula, to entertain the joint petition filed by the couple for divorce by mutual consent by waiving off the mandatory six-month period and proceed with the petition by recording respective statements of the parties.

End of agony!

The subject is open to many views. What are yours? Your response, in the format given below (Pl scroll down a bit) is welcome.




Also read:



By John B Monteiro
To submit your article / poem / short story to Daijiworld, please email it to mentioning 'Article/poem submission for daijiworld' in the subject line. Please note the following:

  • The article / poem / short story should be original and previously unpublished in other websites except in the personal blog of the author. We will cross-check the originality of the article, and if found to be copied from another source in whole or in parts without appropriate acknowledgment, the submission will be rejected.
  • The author of the poem / article / short story should include a brief self-introduction limited to 500 characters and his/her recent picture (optional). Pictures relevant to the article may also be sent (optional), provided they are not bound by copyright. Travelogues should be sent along with relevant pictures not sourced from the Internet. Travelogues without relevant pictures will be rejected.
  • In case of a short story / article, the write-up should be at least one-and-a-half pages in word document in Times New Roman font 12 (or, about 700-800 words). Contributors are requested to keep their write-ups limited to a maximum of four pages. Longer write-ups may be sent in parts to publish in installments. Each installment should be sent within a week of the previous installment. A single poem sent for publication should be at least 3/4th of a page in length. Multiple short poems may be submitted for single publication.
  • All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format or text file. Pictures should not be larger than 1000 pixels in width, and of good resolution. Pictures should be attached separately in the mail and may be numbered if the author wants them to be placed in order.
  • Submission of the article / poem / short story does not automatically entail that it would be published. Daijiworld editors will examine each submission and decide on its acceptance/rejection purely based on merit.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to edit the submission if necessary for grammar and spelling, without compromising on the author's tone and message.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to reject submissions without prior notice. Mails/calls on the status of the submission will not be entertained. Contributors are requested to be patient.
  • The article / poem / short story should not be targeted directly or indirectly at any individual/group/community. Daijiworld will not assume responsibility for factual errors in the submission.
  • Once accepted, the article / poem / short story will be published as and when we have space. Publication may take up to four weeks from the date of submission of the write-up, depending on the number of submissions we receive. No author will be published twice in succession or twice within a fortnight.
  • Time-bound articles (example, on Mother's Day) should be sent at least a week in advance. Please specify the occasion as well as the date on which you would like it published while sending the write-up.

Comment on this article

  • Kedhar, Mangaluru

    Mon, Apr 10 2023

    To get their act together on all fronts 🤔?If not possible them let go?

Leave a Comment

Title: Should Divorced Couples Be Chained for Six Months?

You have 2000 characters left.


Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will be held responsible.