Are We Headed for Polygamy?

March 5, 2022

I am monogamous from time to time, but I prefer polygamy and polyandry.” – Carla Bruni (b.1967), Italian-French singer and professional model.

Polygamy and polyandry trace their origin to ancient times. In Mahabharata, Draupdi had five husbands and the rationale of it has been explained down the ages. Emperors and kings had their harems to the envy of their courtiers and commoners.

Now, a new phenomenon has emerged on the love scene – live-in relationship outside the sacramental or legal bonding. The scene is getting hot with higher judiciary conferring its imprimatur on such non-sacramental sexual links. The case cited below from The Times of India (1/3/22) seems to ignore the ritually married husband of the lady involved in the High Court intervention. But, first the excerpted report.

Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that the times are changing fast and it is time to shift perspective from didactics of the orthodox society.

“The times are changing fast, even in those lands that were left behind and stuck with the old ethos and conservative social milieu. We are governed by the rule of law and follow constitutional dharma. In the ever-evolving society, evolving the law with it, the time is to shift perspective from didactics of the orthodox society, shackled with the strong strings of morality supported by religions to one that values an individual’s life above all,” observed Justice Anoop Chitkara while granting protection to a couple from Punjab’s Fazilka district. The woman in this case is married but is voluntarily part of a live-in relationship with another male partner.

The judge held that every person in India has an inherent and indefeasible fundamental right to life flowing from Article 21 of the Constitution and the State is duty-bound to protect life.

The couple had approached the HC fearing for their lives and liberty at the hands of the woman’s relatives, including her husband. They had sought protection by invoking their fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The counsel for the petitioners stated that the female petitioner is married and voluntarily started a live-in relationship with the male petitioner. He submitted that the petitioners must be protected even though the female petitioner is married to Respondent No. 4 (husband of the petitioner).

The judge observed that if the allegations of apprehension of threat to their lives turn out to be true, it might lead to an irreversible loss. “This court is not adjudicating on the validity of the petitioners’ marriage or her decision of cohabiting with petitioner No. 1 (male petitioner) but adhering to its fundamental duty of guarding their lives. Thus, in the facts and circumstances peculiar to this case, it shall be appropriate that the concerned superintendent of police, SHO, or any officer to whom such powers have been delegated or have been authorised in this regard, provide appropriate protection to the petitioners,” ordered the court.

The HC also held that the protection would be subject to the stringent condition that from the time such protection is given, the petitioners shall not go outside the boundaries of the place of their residence, except for medical necessities, to buy household necessities, and for bereavements in the families of the persons who are close to them. This restriction saves the petitioners from apprehended risk and ensures that the protection is not flaunted, observed the judge.

The subject - despite and beyond the HC judgment cited above – is open to many views. What are yours? Your response is welcome in the format given below (Pl. scroll down).


A brown-skinned husband was on his death-bed. He implored his fair-skinned wife to sit by his bedside and asked who sired the first brown-skinned child and the next four fair skinned kids. “Tell the truth and all will be forgiven”. The wife confessed: “The first is yours…” The man turned his face away from the wife and gave up his ghost.


Also read:






By John B Monteiro
To submit your article / poem / short story to Daijiworld, please email it to mentioning 'Article/poem submission for daijiworld' in the subject line. Please note the following:

  • The article / poem / short story should be original and previously unpublished in other websites except in the personal blog of the author. We will cross-check the originality of the article, and if found to be copied from another source in whole or in parts without appropriate acknowledgment, the submission will be rejected.
  • The author of the poem / article / short story should include a brief self-introduction limited to 500 characters and his/her recent picture (optional). Pictures relevant to the article may also be sent (optional), provided they are not bound by copyright. Travelogues should be sent along with relevant pictures not sourced from the Internet. Travelogues without relevant pictures will be rejected.
  • In case of a short story / article, the write-up should be at least one-and-a-half pages in word document in Times New Roman font 12 (or, about 700-800 words). Contributors are requested to keep their write-ups limited to a maximum of four pages. Longer write-ups may be sent in parts to publish in installments. Each installment should be sent within a week of the previous installment. A single poem sent for publication should be at least 3/4th of a page in length. Multiple short poems may be submitted for single publication.
  • All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format or text file. Pictures should not be larger than 1000 pixels in width, and of good resolution. Pictures should be attached separately in the mail and may be numbered if the author wants them to be placed in order.
  • Submission of the article / poem / short story does not automatically entail that it would be published. Daijiworld editors will examine each submission and decide on its acceptance/rejection purely based on merit.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to edit the submission if necessary for grammar and spelling, without compromising on the author's tone and message.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to reject submissions without prior notice. Mails/calls on the status of the submission will not be entertained. Contributors are requested to be patient.
  • The article / poem / short story should not be targeted directly or indirectly at any individual/group/community. Daijiworld will not assume responsibility for factual errors in the submission.
  • Once accepted, the article / poem / short story will be published as and when we have space. Publication may take up to four weeks from the date of submission of the write-up, depending on the number of submissions we receive. No author will be published twice in succession or twice within a fortnight.
  • Time-bound articles (example, on Mother's Day) should be sent at least a week in advance. Please specify the occasion as well as the date on which you would like it published while sending the write-up.

Comment on this article

  • mohan prabhu, mangalore

    Sun, Mar 27 2022

    John I didn't see this one from you earlier. The wife wants to eat the cake and have it too. Perhaps the Petitioner husband is afraid that he might be saddled with hefty alimony if he decided to seek a divorce. He must still be dependent on her for getting his meals prepared - cheaper than hiring a cook. Polygamy involves multiple marriages, but legally "keeps" do not amount to polygamy; i they do, laws against bigamy will be slapped against polygamous and polyandrous couple.

  • Daniel, Mangalore

    Wed, Mar 09 2022

    Also, Looks like using 1% polygamy, (other than muslims) 1% Same Sex, 1% No gender ideology communist chinese trying control whole world ? or These 3 percentage control the world in the name of humanity and equal justice is the another question ? But it started with 1% Abortion where Socialist Russia is the first country to legalise it in 1920. Now a dominating percentage worldwide, is the another communist ideology for their (future) better control, specially the west. They start these modern ideologies in their countries but end up controlling other countries or enslaving the world.

  • Shadab, Darjeeling

    Wed, Mar 09 2022

    What is the proof that made you conclude we are heading to polygamy?

  • Range Rover, DK

    Mon, Mar 07 2022

    Headed? The government should pass laws supporting it and make it legal. It will restore balance in household and men can live in peace. Competition is healthy instead of monopoly. You are mature and so are your thoughts. Salutes to you Sir.

  • Daniel, Mangalore

    Mon, Mar 07 2022

    ...Contd, but first court mandate for approval of it ? Instead of long debate to make it a Law or Act and uncertainity in getting it passed, This shortcut ?

  • Daniel, Mangalore

    Mon, Mar 07 2022

    These looks like all western communist induced traits to break families now coming to India also. To bring difference in opinion as happenning in communist infilterated west. Basically divide and rule policy, bring in many difference of opinions similar to no gender, same sex to bring liberalism which is a modern name for communism in the name of equal justice, humanity. Western youth fell to the their trap, thinking it is liberalism or freedom to do whatever they like, also hot or need of the hour / time or modern thinking or times. ////// Finally once they got power and put a weak president in the west then these socialists and communists (chinese) start their bio warfare then invasion for total ruthless worldwide dictatorship or Godless New World Order, enslave humanity. Decimate much with virus and vaccine for better control. So all these started and ongoing invasion, pandemics or high tech military binary virus and vaccine wars for world control. So from family disintegration to world control is the agenda of communist China

Leave a Comment

Title: Are We Headed for Polygamy?

You have 2000 characters left.


Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will be held responsible.