Recent controversies in Indian food industry


New Delhi, May 21 (IANS): While Nestle has been asked to recall a batch of its popular snack "Maggi" after some samples reportedly tested positive for higher-than-permissible levels of lead and monosodium glutamate, in recent past some food processing companies and brands have been similarly embroiled in controversies.

The incidents were:

December 2014: In a report submitted to the Delhi High Court, the Delhi government's food safety department deemed rice dishes sold by KFC and Sagar Ratna "unsafe" due to the presence of harmful artificial colouring.

Days later, the Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, reported that "cooked rice" sold by KFC "conforms" to the general provisions of food safety and standards.

June 2014: A businessman from Coimbatore found a worm in a piece of chicken bought from KFC. While the franchise restaurant refused to comment, Genesis Burson Marsteller, on behalf of KFC India, acknowledged receiving the complaint.

October 2012: Similar incident of worms being found in KFC chicken were reported from Kerala by the Food safety Department, leading to the closure of the outlet in Thiruvananthapuram.

October 2003: A few instances of worms in Cadbury dairy milk chocolate bars were reported in Maharashtra.

December 2006: Cadbury paid a compensation of Rs.15,000 to a man who found worms and fungi in his chocolate.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • harish, banglore

    Sat, May 30 2015

    Its a fake news on the market .nestle is. Produced trusted brand.company aim s nutrition.health and wellness.Company continuous excellence will.engage everyone's heart to mind in a consumer driven food safety..

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Recent controversies in Indian food industry



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.