Editor's Pick

Udupi: Exclusive - Construction of intolerance engineered at national level, says P Sainath


Pearl D'Souza
Daijiworld Media Network - Udupi
Pics: Crazy Frog Media

Udupi, Aug 26: About 1.3 billion people celebrated being Indian, this Independence Day. PM Modi reignited the idea of a 'new India' and President Kovind urged for a 'compassionate society' for new India by the next five years. A suject remains at the forefront of debate - what defines being 'Indian', and what constitutes 'Indian culture'.

"Citizenship does imply national obligations. It necessitates adherence to and affection for the nation in all its rich diversity," said former Vice President Hamid Ansari, concluding his last address during his term.

Diversity has been at the heart of our democratic nation. But when torchbearers of democratic ideals feel apprehensive about the state of Indian democracy, there is cause for concern.

Showing similar concern has been the esteemed Indian journalist and Magsaysay award winner Palagummi Sainath. In a candid interview with daijiworld during his recent visit to Udupi, he spoke about India's rich diversity, the harm done to it, and the role of media amidst this. Sainath's organisation People's Archive of Rural India is 'a living archive of the world’s most complex countryside' - rural India and captures the everyday life of everyday people. It is a repository to the complex worlds within the subcontinent - a salad bowl of sorts - a small effort to bring out the large diversity in India.






Excerpts

Q: What's your idea of India?

Ans: I think there are ideas of India. The village haat (in Odisha), where people argue, fight, sell products in 16 different languages... Mumbai's trains used to be like that. Twenty-one languages were heard on the trains of Mumbai as people went to work.


Q: Our economy and our society is so interlinked that the cultures too are interlinked. One is dependant on the other in a way that may not seem obvious. But has there always been a sort of understanding or is it just being said that India was a very cohesive nation?

Ans: It's not that there was no conflict. But Indians were far more cohesive than they are being made out to be today.

There was conflict. But there was conflict when there was breakdown. Those breakdowns were counter to the needs and interdependence of the society. Now, conflict exists as an agenda, and regimes making breakdowns has become a norm. It is a very different thing. If there are communal riots between two communities over some incident, that's one thing. If the state becomes an actor in it, it's quite another. So, it's not that everything was always cohesive. But there was a great deal of recognition of interdependence.

If you look at the partition, the Sikh Gurdwaras, do you know who sings the Gurbani in those old Gurdwaras? The hereditary singers in those Gurdwaras are Muslims.

Various forms of interdependence existed and people recognised this and continued with it. There was a degree of tolerance by default. Now you have a kind of intolerance by policy and agenda.

Cow slaughter ban was based on an entire bogus philosophy. There is every evidence to show from the epics, vedas, and from a lot of scriptures, that Hindus were big consumers of beef. Beef consumption and it was quite normal. Even now, by default, 42% of your population has no problem with beef. 14% are Muslims - they have no religious injunction against it. 16.8% are Dalits - Beef serves as the cheapest source of protein. 2.5% are Christians - they don't have an ideological problem with beef. 2.5% are Sikhs - largely no problem, they never had any scriptural injunctions against it. 8% Adivasis - some don't drink milk, but they eat beef. And then millions of Hindus eat beef - in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra, and elsewhere.

Yet this kind of intolerance is coming in every way.

In sum, the interdependence was and is there. But there has never been such a conscious intolerence. The society used to break down locally in one region in one place or another. Now that breakdown and construction of intolerance has been consciously engineered at a national level.


Q: What then would you say are aspects bulldozing our diversity?

Ans: Diversity means heterogeneity also. It means pluralism. Damage to diversity has been going on for decades. Massive intolerance towards the 'cultures' and 'habits' of others, extremely poor language policy and our social attitude to other languages, and lack of thinking about what our problems are, only deepens the crisis.

Right now, the country is in the midst of a ridiculous phase, where we try to impose our eating habits on others. 'You cannot eat beef, you cannot..' that kind of stuff. That intolerance and fundamentalist thought create the problems we are talking about.

As for language, there are 780 languages in this country, and 225 have died in the past 50 years. Barely 4% of those languages are taught beyond 6th or 7th std. Neglect of languages has created a situation where many languages are in danger of dying. In the entire Indian university system, there are only two departments for the study of endangered language. One in Hyderabad Central University, the other in Amarkantak. Mysuru too had a centre for Indian languages. So, you're having no departments of endangered language, but more and more of CSIR, science institutes being given orders that they must have a Sanskrit cell in them. That same intolerance pushes many of the other aspects - 'People have got to live the way we think Indians should be' is the attitude.

We do not have a language policy that worries about preserving all Indian languages. But policy is one thing. Socially, I think mostly middle class and elite have been extremely insensitive to the languages - particularly to the tribal, Adivasi languages.

And now you have in force, a group that tries to homogenise everything while boasting of diversity. Now you're going to say that we've got a bunch of zealots in power who want to say that everybody must learn Hindi, completely ignoring the disasters of the 60s when they tried to impose Hindi in Tamil Nadu.

You will find that in Mangaluru the Buthas, and Thayyams of Kerala are pre-puranic Hindus. But now you have people trying to appropriate them to mainstream Hinduism. But you have the RSS then trying to say that this is 'Hindu culture'. You go to Tamil Nadu and make Murugan an avatar of Shiva. Murugan is much older than Shiva. So this kind of trying assimilation and homogenisation is also problematic.

With this kind of force and no policies on language, things are going to get a lot worse. Yes, all these problems were there earlier. But they have grown exponentially in the last 2-3 years.






Q: Repurcussions of the ban on cattle sale for slaughter?

Ans: It's been a domino effect, a devastating one. It shows you how little they (government) know of their country. They have this imagined nation. Very fevered imagination. Or none at all. They wanted to hit the Muslims. How many occupations have we destroyed by this. Farmers can't sell cows and don't have the money to buy new ones. Farmers in Uttarakhand, Vidarbha are abandoning their cows at the forest edge for leopards to get them. The cattle markets have collapsed and with that, hundreds of occupations have too. The guys who make the shoes, those who make the little bells for the cows. And above all, the dalals of the cattle market - the agents. The Marathas are Hindus, the dalals are Hindus, OBCs - they're also finished, because there is zero sale in many cattle markets right now. People who make Kohlapuri chappals, are not able to get hides. They tried sourcing the hide from Tamil Nadu and the vans were burnt in Karnataka and Maharashtra borders. So, every one of them is effected.

I met farmers during the drought in Marathwada last year. He said he had 6-8 cows and could not sell or buy. He could not get food enough for his family because of this crisis. 'How will I look after these cows?' he asked me. I suggested he sells them. He said 'Yeah, we get onto the the highway and these thugs kill us.'

Christians are affected because of diet. Dalits are affected because who makes leather? Muslims are affected because of diet and trade. The Marathas are affected because of farming. OBCs are affected because they are the dalals at the cattle market. Who isn't affected? This type of intolerance has impacts far beyond what you can find.


Q: Are there grave events and stories in Mangaluru that seem under-reported?

Ans: There are stories. When I came to Mangaluru many years back, I was doing a project on Dalits for the Hindu Sunday magazine. My colleague and I visited a school where the school drama was being staged and only the upper caste students had roles in the drama. The play was Raja Harishchandra. Great mythological figure. And then people protested, it was a Dalit dominated school, that 'our children are not there'. It was a big controversy. And they tried resolving the controversy by giving a Dalit boy the role of a butcher. This was the play Raja Harishchandra. They created a role, a fictional character, a character who had no role even in that fiction, even in the original. And that also was a token representation.

This was in the twin districts area. There are issues of caste discrimination. There are issues of the rise of fundamentalism, which is very serious in coastal Karnataka. All these are issues. There is no shortage of issues.


Q: But by writing about fundamentalism and rising communalism, aren't we inciting more?

Ans: That is an ostrich attitude. It's like saying, if I bury my head in the sand, and shut my eyes tight and see no evil... That never helps. You have the right to focus, bring more serious issues to the foreground. But if something obnoxious is happening, to say 'I won't cover that' is not a good response. You have to show why it is happening.


Q: What role do journalists play in filling the gap between reality and the illusion created?

Ans: The fundamental feature of the mass media of our time is the growing distinction, the growing gap between mass media and mass reality. Today you have mass media without masses. It reaches masses, and excludes masses. They may have a giant reach but the number of people who get to participate in them, express their views, their opinions is less than 0.001%.

The challenge of a journalist in our times, is to sell your labour without selling your soul. Second, to expand the public space in a private domain, in an increasingly privately owned media, to push the boundaries of public interest as against private interest within a private domain, to connect with the society and tell stories of those who can't speak for themselves, whom we do not allow to speak, to create a situation where they can speak for themselves and not even be dependent on media, to undermine the monopolies that we're working in. How do we end such great monopoly in media? As long as there is monopoly there will be no smaller voices of dissent.

There are lots of people who write good stories but can't get them published. I came into journalism at a different time and that's why I was luckier.

A journalist should also be participating in every kind activity that strengthens his or her independence as a reporter, as a journalist. And ultimately it means that we also have to act as citizens, we have to have legislations to break the media monopoly. One person cannot be allowed to own half the Indian media. It's ridiculous.

A generation has grown up thinking anchors yelling and stamping the table and hitting the table with their fist, is journalism. That is also the responsibility of journalists - to record, inform, educate oneself first, then your audience. And also be educated by your audience.

Here's the paradox. You've got a society that is unbelievably diverse and more and more heterogenous. And you're trying to cover it with a media that is more and more concentrated and narrow and homogenous. Can such a media tell the stories of the Indian people? They cannot. You can tell the stories of bollywood, fashion models, Kabaddi league at best, IPL. That's it. What else can they do. Nothing else makes the money.







Q: But stories you speak of, don't sell

Ans: They readers will tell you, it's absolutely untrue.

It's not that the readers are saying it (that such stories don't sell). The choice of media agenda is one, self interest, two, the advertiser who is the primary person. When an editor says, 'not what the reader wants'. He just means really 'not what the advertisers want'.

I was told the same by 20 editors when I was trying to do my project, before I got the Times of India Fellowship. In January 1997, the book came out - 'Everybody Loves a Good Drought'. It has had 50 reprints since. It has stayed in sale for 20 years. If people were not interested, why would that be? If people are not interested, why should a book on poverty be a Penguin bestseller for 20 years?

Readers didn't demand 8 pages of Bollywood, which you put in as a supplement. You created an audience. You did that for advertisement. The supplement that comes - Bombay Times - please read what it says - advertorial, industrial and promotional material. Because of the paid news scandal, they are now forced to put that. They are forced to say that. I created the situation where they had to say that.

What kind of subjects were we speaking about at the talk (in Udupi)? Imagine the thousand odd people who came despite the rain. It tells me that people are interested in the subject. It tells me that people are interested in serious discussions. So don't blame the victim.


Q: Is there a ray of optimism in the trajectory the media and society is going?

Ans: Yes. Things will get better. But they will get a lot worse before they get better. If I was not an optimist, why would I remain in this profession. There is a lot of optimism in the way ordinary people continue with their lives, against all odds. A society that produced Captain Bhau Lad ( 94 year old forgotten hero of India’s struggle for freedom). That kind of person exists. A Karimul Haque (humanitarian who runs a 'bike ambulance' free of cost for villagers in West Bengal) exists. But I'm saying, don't use optimism as a security blanket or an escape - that is fake optimism.


Q: If you were a journalist starting out now what would it be like?

Ans: I don't know. When I came in, the atmosphere in Indian journalism was not what it is today. Everybody had a labour correspondent, an agriculture correspondent. Now, agriculture correspondent is someone who covers agriculture ministry, not the farmers.

The media's role has changed, concentration has grown, the concept of social responsibility of the media is dead. They treat it with contempt. Their job is to make money for the shareholders. That's what corporate media does. So you got to work there. You've got to fight within and fight outside.

It would be much more challenging, because the forums have declined. The space has declined. Newspapers are not about journalism. The media are very little into journalism. They are much more about revenue making. As much as 95% of your revenue comes from advertisers and 5% comes from sale of your newspaper. You are going to treat the advertiser 16-17 times more important than the reader.

One, as you said, it's how well the story is told also. That is true. But I'm saying, I know very good journalists who can tell a story but can't find a job. Because that's not the primary requirement of the media. They need people who do reports and stories that further the business of the media.

Where 30 years ago, the job of the media was to deliver information to audiences, in the last 30 years the job of the media has become to deliver audiences to advertisers and marketers. That's the change in the role of media.


Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Shetty, Mangalore

    Sun, Aug 27 2017

    Confused comrade.....better think about saving your last remaining bastion Kerala........

    DisAgree [6] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • anthony, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    A forthrght interview by Sir Sainath. What is alarming is that the media who are supposed to be the watch Dogs in a democracy have regretfully become the unofficial spokesmen of the BJP and the Central Govt. They should all carry the logo of the old gramaphone company " His Masters Voice"

    DisAgree [3] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • SMR, Karkala

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    First of all I would like to appreciate Daijiworld and Ms.Pearl D'Souza for publishing this interview. P Sainath is one of the few remaining hopes of the unified India and pluralism.
    There is very much truth in every essence of his narratives to the journalist. Moral police and Lynching India are the few examples are the experiment BJP which successfully engineered to create panic among the minorities as well as secular Hindu brothers.

    Decreasing Human rights from 'basic rights of food' to' privacy', which governance of BJP wanted to curb are the few best examples.

    Dear Daiji kindly organise such interview in the future to create awareness among Indians about the threat perception and strive hard unite the Mangalorean to become 'smart citizens' of the future 'smart city'.
    Jai hind

    DisAgree [4] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Richard Moras, Bejai,Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Mr.Amar,this sort of incidents have occurred since independence in every state.It is accepted that law and order should prevail and appropriate steps should be taken.But it has gone beyond control in some cases.Have you forgotten the violence in Karnataka over Kaveri water issue last year?Do not be selective.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Muhammad Ali Uchil, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    A big thanks to Daiji ,Sainath Sir & Ms.Pearl D'Souza for publishing the super ,one of the best interview & analysis I ever come across.This is a true Indian spirt,keep the spirit!

    DisAgree Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Richard Moras, Bejai,Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Leftist ideology is reflected in the interview.When a person thinks himself as intelligent ,he even considers nationalism and patriotism as communal.They start supporting separatist in Kashmir,slogans against the country in JNU university as freedom of expression.We do not agree with banning of beef but the issue should not be exaggerated.Majority of Hindus are secular and they believe in unity in diversity.There are many so called secularists and protectors of democracy.But when draconian emergency was declared in 1975,they were silent.

    DisAgree [17] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Amar, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    @Richard Moras, Bejai,Mangalore

    'You let Panchkula burn for political benefits: HC slams Haryana govt; DCP shunted '

    http://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay.aspx?newsID=468578

    now tell me, is it his imagination about the government orchestrating violence? Is the HC also wrong?

    DisAgree [4] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Satya, Mangalore

    Sun, Aug 27 2017

    Applying the same logic, I would say that all of today's leaders like Jaitley, Sushma, etc who were JNU students way back in the 70's are all anti national. They claim to have fought against emergency. The same way today's youth is fighting against division and polarization. Emergency was bad but it was imposed by one party to remain in power and they were promptly kicked out. But today's ruling dispensation in engineering divisiveness which is tearing the very fabric of the country. The leaders who until recently refused to hoist the national flag and were not part of the freedom struggle are today lecturing us on patriotism and nationalism. When freedom fighters were rotting in jail, these very same nationalists were sending mercy petitions to the colonial masters to escape prison and were in a cosy relationship with the colonial masters. You cannot brush aside lynchings and murder on innocents as isolated incidents and claim that they have always been happening. Such incidents are a national shame.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Suman, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Buddi jeevi ...

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Udupi

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    If a book is written pinpointing all the worldly problem is because of one community called HINDUUS.. Praise every damn brutality in the country if the victims are hinduus.. criticize everything when the purpatrators are remotely connected with hindusim .. just paint everyone else as extreme inocents. Magssssy, bookr, nobbel all awards will come calling.

    Must NOT mention on those who brought only misery to this world.. with such bitter truth a book forget award, it can only get fatwa, comuncal tag etc

    DisAgree [6] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ganesh, Udupi

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    He reminds me Buddha in traffic Jam!!

    DisAgree [5] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Amar, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    as do you

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Palagummi Sainath would have made a better story writer than a journalist.
    The answer for the question "Are there grave events and stories in Mangaluru that seem under-reported?" looks so foolish and imaginary. He must be under the impression that Mangalore is as backward and underdeveloped as his birthplace in Andhra!!

    DisAgree [18] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Santosh R, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Just btw, he was born in Chennai.

    Maybe that's the difference between a journalist and a story teller - Facts!

    DisAgree Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Caste based discrimination in schools of Mangalore???
    Even decades before during our schooling, nothing of that sort was there!

    DisAgree [13] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Santosh R, Mangalore

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    His standpoint makes sense as investigation is needed to see such trends.

    For instance, Untouchability-based practice still survives in India. We don't share a bottle of water someone else has out their mouth to. Our surnames being used everywhere are our biggest proof of discrimination via exclusion.

    Discrimination exsists. "ostrich attitude" won't help, just like he said. Those who do not fight discrimination , practice it.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [18] Report Abuse

  • alan j aloysius, mississauga

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Shanker, Truth is always bitter is it not.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    Last three years I have been saying this ...

    DisAgree [7] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Udupi

    Sat, Aug 26 2017

    so is Pappu and company.. since 2014 May, India was such an extras ordinary place till then...
    then came chaiwala and the entire pappu company entered into dark ages

    DisAgree [17] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sun, Aug 27 2017

    Rajesh, Udupi,
    I hope you at least understand what you are writing ...

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

Leave a Comment

Title : Udupi: Exclusive - Construction of intolerance engineered at national level, says P Sainath


 
 
 
 

 
You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.


Security Validation

Enter the characters in the image