After Chief Justice breaks down, PM proposes a closed-door meeting


NEW DELHI, Apr 24 (TOI) : After the Chief Justice of India (CJI) broke down in front of Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday on the issue of the overworked judiciary, the PM proposed a closed-door meeting with him to discuss manpower issues and judicial reforms.

The PM's invitation came in response to CJI TS Thakur's impassioned speech at a conference on Sunday of chief ministers and high court justices, during which he urged the government to refrain from criticizing the judiciary because judicial reform was in the hands of the executive - and the executive hasn't kept its part of the bargain.

"... it is not only in the name of a litigant or people languishing in jails but also in the name of development of the country, its progress that I beseech you to rise to the occasion and realise that it is not enough to criticise. You cannot shift the entire burden on the judiciary," the Chief Justice said, choking up.

Prime Minister Modi assured the CJI of his government's resolve in finding a solution jointly with the judiciary.
"I can understand his pains..that the 1987 proposal (of increasing the judge, population ratio) was not fulfilled by the government," PM Modi said while addressing the conference.

The PM was referring to a 1987 Law Commission recommendation to increase the number of judges to 50 judges per 10 lakh people from the then 10 judges per 10 lakh people.

"Nothing has moved" since 1987, the CJI stated baldly.

"I don't know what were the constraints the previous governments faced in implementing this proposal (of increasing the judge to population ratio), but my government will look into it seriously and try to solve this," the PM said in his short speech.

Three decades later, the judge to population ration is a mere 16-17 judges per 10 lakh people, in a country that has added 25 crore people.
" ... how do you think the judiciary's present strength of 16,000 can dispose of a case pendency of 3 crore," the CJI said while looking directly at Modi.

"Hon'ble PM the commercial courts project is one of your prime agendas but what's happening? These commercial courts are being designated out of the existing courts. Will that serve the purpose when the concept was to provide a different environment for commercial disputes?" the CJI said.

Modi is man of action.he has taken swift action already... im sure CJI will be happy with PM's swift action...

The PM also said efficiency when making laws needs to be increased. "There are so many laws that are redundant and not suited for the times, those need to be removed," PM Modi said.

Justice Thakur probably put it best when he said : "Simply putting old wine in new bottle will not serve the purpose."

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • MICHAEL NORONHA, Mysore

    Mon, Apr 25 2016

    Unless the Judiciary keeps the same pace with reforms the problems of the common man cannot be redressed. The enormous backlog in cases redundant laws and few laws which are changed by the Central Govt., that has earned the wrath of the common man (eg.,EPF)are all issues that needs to be looked into. The Central Government does not dialogue with the Heads of the Judiciary and State Governments (especially the non BJP Governments) and is more engrossed in subverting the Constitution in its attempts to make the country "Opposition mukth bharath". Such attitude harms the nation and does not help in solving problems. Hope the tears of the CJI will be a wake up call to the PM and his team to act.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • tony, mangalore

    Mon, Apr 25 2016

    I want share exp in court I have to give witness in one case it is an only 3 min job for this I visited 3 times . The court started at 11 am and call all cases posted for that day until 12 . they posting 80 cases per day after that they start one by one. 2 pm to 3.00 lunch break 3.30 reopen at 4.15 they start to give dates for pending cases and close
    If this the issue why they have to post the that much cases simply wast of time .

    We have lot of Unemployed lawyer whey they cannot take for drafting work in the courts so that the will time may be saved for judges.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • SK, Mangalore

    Mon, Apr 25 2016

    will our 56" chest, bring the changes..... Tails are always bent... The moral they learnt on the first day " JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED " is left in the air, and the practice is commercialized.... The curses of the innocents will not go waste.....

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Lawrence, Mangalore

    Mon, Apr 25 2016

    Judicial reform is the need of the hour in India. The current system is the slowest judiciary system in the world. The money spent on keeping the under trials in custody can be used to hire more judges. Justice delayed, justice denied. No court case should prolong more than a year. Mediation of civil cases can also expedite the disposal of pending cases.

    In the USA, there is a docket system. When both parties are ready for the hearing/trial, they should pick the available date from the court calendar. This system will avoid several visits to court for adjournments.

    US judiciary system has a lengthy process of Jury Trial yet, it works efficiently.

    Indian Govt. should send a committee to study the functioning of western judiciary system and implement the recommendations, if they are helpful to quick disposal of pending cases.

    Does the Indian legislators have a will to bring the changes? Perhaps not. Because of many Legislators with criminal charges will get justice soon and that will be detrimental to the political career of some of those legislators.

    In fact, the CJI should pass an order to the effect that all cases against the public servants (including legislators) shall be dealt in fast courts and should be disposed off in 6-12 months.

    Then only one can see the light at the end of the tunnel.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Roshan, mangaluru

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Judiciary by n large is unwilling and a happy with situation govt does not want change. CJI found himself caught between two and exasperated. His tears are of helplessness. Many cases are pending that involves top leadership of bjp. If he takes constitutional view his future will be in shambles. If he takes bjp side future of India will be in shambles. He does not know how to deal with it.

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Clifford, Mangalore

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    If Chief justice is crying what about the poor victims?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • AMAR NATHAL, MANGALORE

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Politicians would try to push their agenda as impartial judiciary is not their agenda. Why should the CJI beg, why can't the President who is the defender of every citizen put pressure? Impartial Judiciary is the Hope of India.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur, Puttur / Mangalore

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Finished. CJI Surrendered.
    Don't expect Justice.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Langoolacharya., Belman/Washington,DC.

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Hon'ble CJI,

    US has a population of 33 Crores...and we have 9 Supreme Court judges...and nobody complains of over work and cry...

    Indian Court starts at 11 AM till 5 PM...British started this practice...till continued by modern day Brits...Brits were using time 9AM-11AM to sit in Courts and study the cases thoroughly...so they were well prepared to interject and ask questions for both sides if needed...so judgements were fair and comprehensive....so judges and judgements were well respected by both sides...

    Now could you show any single Supreme Court/High Court judge coming to courts before 11 AM and study that days cases posted by Registrar of that court???

    High Court judge who acquitted J Jayalaitha could not even count properly...this is state of affairs of Indian higher judiciary...first correct your own house before blaming others...

    We don't need dozens of appeals on lower court judgements...one appeal is good enough...so all cases are decided within 1 years...currently they could be prolonged for at least 100 years if appellant has money to pay lawyers fee...

    ...JH...

    DisAgree Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri, Karkala

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    CJI's man Ki bath.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ravi C, mangalore

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Sir Chief Justice you got the supreme power in India. How can you break down in front of PM like this? Would your justice to citizen of this nation also would depend on govt.?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Prp, Mlore

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Shame, CJI getting emotional in public. Not a fit person for that place.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh S, MANGALORE

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    ..so that he can weep inside closed door and not get embarrassed..its a shame CJI wept..if CJI is really serious, he should remove colonial era hoilday vacation of 30-40 days..courts works hardly 200 days a year..British left long ago but tradition continiouse..Not only Govts, its successive CJI's also mistake..they are the supreme court, they give so many strict orders, they should have given time bound directive to fill the vacancy..then why they didnt do!!..May be CJI thought MODI is the right person who can do something which not happened in 60 years..

    DisAgree [3] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • MyrightIsaid, bengaluru

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Ramesh S.

    I also think so - they are hand in hand in this - making it look only Modi can do it.
    Let him do it and rightfully credit goes to Modi and his Govt. and that will put to shame all the previous Govts. for sleeping over it.

    Why CJI should get emotional ...!!!? Ask\demand for your requirement.
    It is not good at all CJI to get emotional. It affects.....

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • arm, ksa

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Hope now judiciary is not demonized inside closed door.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh, Udupi

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    If proposal is waiting since 1987, it is too bad.. Modi must take it on priority and revise it to the present day needs

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sun, Apr 24 2016

    Computerize all the Cases & leave the judgement to the Computer.
    DIGITAL INDIA ...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sanjeev Kamath, Udupi

    Mon, Apr 25 2016

    Jossey, you could have given this
    Golden suggestion to the earlier government, which has added cases in multiples for its own benefit.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, Apr 25 2016

    Sanjeev Kamath, Udupi.
    Our entire Judicial System runs on Case Laws. 90% of all case Laws are already fed into the system.
    Using Data Mining Software all relevant case laws pertaining to the case can be easily pulled out.
    This will felicitate easy reference & accurate judgment in just three or four sittings. I did not bother to
    suggest to the previous Government because only BJP understands Digital India …

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: After Chief Justice breaks down, PM proposes a closed-door meeting



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.