US Congress set to pass new gun deal as Bipartisan Committee reaches agreement


By Ashok Nilakantan

New York, Jun 23 (IANS): The US Congress seems all set to pass the new gun law based on the Bipartisan Committee Framework legislation of 20 Senators from the Democrats and Republicans, even as major efforts are on from the right and left to kill it, besides citizens don't seem happy with all the provisions and a section of the Republicans are dead against it.

Reports coming in from Washington indicate that the meaningful package of gun restrictions in decades -- a rare bipartisan achievement, could become law.

Even if the proposed Bipartisan Safer Communities Act becomes law, the fractious political debate over guns suggests few will be happy with the results, and Republicans and Democrats will keep pushing for measures the other side is unlikely to ever pass, says USA Today dispatch from Washington.

The House Freedom Caucus, for example, a group of the most conservative Congressional Republicans, vowed to fight "red flag" laws that they say "permit the preemptive seizure of firearms from Americans without due process".

In contrast, Senator Patty Murray, Democrat -- Washington, said this bill is not everything that is needed -- "not by a mile" -- and she and others will seek tougher laws.

Nevertheless, Murray said she supports the Senate package because "the most extreme option on the table is doing nothing at all".

The Senate voted late Tuesday to speed up debate on the gun bill, a procedural move supported by 14 Republicans, more than enough to secure passage.

The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act was the brainchild of Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat from Connecticut; John Cornyn, Republican -- Texas, who was booed at the party convention in Austin, Texas, on Saturday, Kyrsten Sinema, Democrat from Arizona and Thom Tillis, Republican from North Carolina.

"We've talked, we've debated, we've disagreed and finally we've reached an agreement," Cornyn said on the Senate floor Tuesday afternoon. Why are the parties coming together now?

Senators from both parties agreed to the specific language of a new gun deal shortly after the latest Congressional hearing on the alleged insurrection at the Capitol Hill on January 6, 2021, by former President Donald Trump's supporters, an investigation that has inflamed party tensions for more than a year and a half.

Republican predictions of a "red wave" this election because of Biden's struggles with inflation, and baby food shortages and gas prices soaring have also made it difficult for the parties to work together -- until Uvalde shootings, which changed it all with the national mood crying for strict gun laws after 14 children and two teachers were shot down by a lone gunman, who got a license at 18 years for a semi-automatic, at the Robb public school in Uvalde in Texas.

The slaying of elementary school children in Texas in May renewed interest in gun laws. Members of both parties saw the tragedy as an opportunity to show voters they could work together for the common good in a moment of crisis, says USA today.

Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat from Connecticut, has been working hard leading bipartisan talks on a gun control deal since his passionate floor speech after the elementary school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, in May.

At some point, the gun deal seemed to be on the brink of collapse with strong opposition from gun lobbyist Congressmen from the Republican party and citizens not happy with the provisions.

But Senate negotiators found bipartisan agreement after the weekend on the two main sticking points -- the "boyfriend loophole" and "red flag" grants. Late Tuesday, the four leading negotiators released a statement saying they finalised "common sense legislation to protect America's children, keep our schools safe, and reduce the threat of violence across our country".

What's got into the Senate gun bill finally? Here's the rundown: While making the agreement on the new gun deal public, the four main Senate negotiators touched on the frequently asked questions and said: The legislation aims to save lives without infringing on Second Amendment rights.

The 20 Senators -- 10 Democrats and 10 Republicans -- who first supported the bipartisan framework have tried to strike that delicate balance throughout negotiations, striving to expand gun safety laws without making it harder for law-abiding citizens to buy guns.

Their legislation would include about $15 billion for mental health and school safety services, which Republicans wanted.

Federal funding would be provided to every state thus incentivising adoption of "red flag" laws, which allow courts to remove firearms from those with serious mental health issues deemed a threat to themselves or others. States that did not enact red flag laws could use the money for other crisis prevention programmes, according to the legislation.

The Senate package would close the "boyfriend loophole," a legislative gray area that leaves some women vulnerable to gun-related domestic violence.

Law prevents domestic violence offenders and boyfriends abusing their girlfriends from buying guns if they abused their spouses or live-in partners with whom they had children. The Senate legislation would expand the law to include "boyfriends" or partners in a current or recent relationship "of a romantic or intimate nature" who have been convicted of domestic violence.

"This provision alone is going to save the lives of so many women who unfortunately die at the hands of a boyfriend or an ex-boyfriend who hunts them down with a firearm," Murphy was quoted as saying.

Another major feature of the proposed legislation is the enhanced background checks on gun buyers 21 years and younger to include their mental health and juvenile justice records.

It would provide a waiting period of 10 business days for the seller and authorities to complete the review. Senators said such a review could have stopped mass shootings last month in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas.

House Majority Whip James Clyburn, Democrat -- South Carolina, told USA TODAY last week that a three-day waiting period in South Carolina is not enough and enabled a racially motivated mass shooting seven years ago in his home state.

"Nine souls were killed in Charleston," Clyburn said, referring to an attack in 2015 when a white supremacist gunman fired on Black worshippers at a church in Charleston.

When is the new gun law legislation likely to be passed by the senate?

Senate John Cornyn, Republican -- Texas, in the forefront of the new gun law negotiations, has been harshly criticised by his own partymen, particularly those owing allegiance to former President Donald Trump. In the primaries of the party leading to the nomination for the House of Representations which goes for the ballot in all the 435 seats, Republicans think Trump is the strongman and supporting him would get them nominations, which it has been so far.

The New York Assembly was quick to pass a 10-pack gun legislation that prohibits sale of semi-automatics to youth under 21, enforces strict background checks on gun salesmen and buyers, focuses on mental health of persons buying guns who are a danger to themselves and others and closes the boyfriend loop, prohibiting sales to spouses or boyfriends with long history of abuse of their partners or girlfriends.

It even wanted the Ethans' law to be invoked which ensures safe storage of unloaded and loaded guns, now in force in 15 states, including Washington DC. Phoenix Police Chief Williams told the Senate Judiciary Committee enforcing the law nationwide could save thousands of lives.

Lawmakers are racing to get the bill passed in the Senate before Congress leaves Capitol Hill Friday for a two-week recess around July 4. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, said Tuesday evening on the Senate floor he expects to pass the gun safety legislation "by the week's end".

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican -- Ketucky, said he supports the bill, providing political cover for other Republicans to back the legislation.

At least 11 GOP (Grand Old Party, nickname for Republicans) Senators support the deal, which is enough to beat a filibuster (blocking the bill): Cornyn, Tillis, McConnell, Mitt Romney of Utah, Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Richard Burr of North Carolina, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Susan Collins of Maine, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Rob Portman of Ohio.

A procedural vote Tuesday evening officially opened debate on the bill, and additional Republican Senators were among the "yes" votes to advance the legislation, including Joni Ernst of Iowa, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Todd Young of Indiana.

If the legislation is adopted in the Senate this week, it will be the most sweeping gun control to make it through either chamber in about 30 years. It's unclear when it could reach the House for a vote. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat -- California, said Tuesday she doesn't anticipate the House would need to delay the holiday recess to pass the Senate bill. She expected both chambers would pass the bill, setting up a question of not if but when.

The Resistance to the New Gun Deal

The resistance to the new gun law began before the legislative text was written and continued once it was released Tuesday. Senators John Thune, Republican --South Dakota, and John Barrasso, Republican from Wyoming, broke with party leaders and voted against advancing the gun deal. Thune and Barrasso are the No. 2 and No. 3 Republicans in the Senate, respectively.

Though most of the Republicans who back the Senate deal, either plan to retire or aren't on the ballot for four years, others face political consequences. Cornyn was booed Saturday in Houston during his speech at the Texas Republican Party's annual convention. The party passed a resolution that formally rebuked Cornyn and other Senate Republicans who support the gun deal, says USA today.

Cornyn is up for reelection in 2026 and hasn't lost a political election in 40 years.

Some voters in states where Senators back the federal legislation said they would remember these votes in four years -- though four years in politics can be an eternity, full of sharp changes and shifting political landscapes. Until this point, the GOP had been a firewall against gun restrictions.

North Carolina Pastor Michael Fox told USA TODAY he "absolutely will not vote for" Tillis in 2026. Burr is not seeking reelection.

"We didn't vote for them to take away our rights," Fox said of the Senators.

The National Rifle Association (NRA), the biggest gun lobbyist both inside Congress and outside, sent out a statement Tuesday opposing the Senate agreement.

Claiming infringement of the Second Amendment, the NRA said, "This legislation can be abused to restrict lawful gun purchases, infringe upon the rights of law-abiding Americans, and use federal dollars to fund gun control measures being adopted by state and local politicians."

Kari Lake, a Republican gubernatorial candidate in Arizona, said that if she wins, "Arizona will not recognise unconstitutional gun laws in our state."

In a tweet, she said, "What are the Feds going to do? Fly down here and arrest a sitting Governor? Call my bluff."

Some Democrats and gun control groups lamented what they perceived as shortcomings of the bill, but they lined up to support it, if only as a first step.

Former US Representative Gabrielle Giffords, severely wounded by a gunman in 2011, said the proposed legislation "takes important steps needed to protect communities and save lives from gun violence," but she said more work needs to be done.

"I know that together we will keep fighting for our safety," Giffords said.

 

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: US Congress set to pass new gun deal as Bipartisan Committee reaches agreement



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.