No more extravagant wedding? Bill in LS seeks cap on guests


New Delhi, Feb 15 (PTI): A Bill in the Lok Sabha seeks to put a limit on the number of guests to be invited and dishes to be served in weddings to check "show of wealth" and wants those spending above Rs 5 lakh to contribute towards marriages of poor girls.

If a family spends above Rs 5 lakh on a wedding, it has to contribute 10 per cent of the amount on marriages of girls from poor families, according to the Bill introduced by Congress MP Ranjeet Ranjan, wife of MP Pappu Yadav.

The Marriages (Compulsory Registration and Prevention of Wasteful Expenditure) Bill, 2016, may be taken up as a private member's Bill in the upcoming Lok Sabha session.

The purpose of this Bill is to prohibit extravagant and wasteful expenditure on marriages and to enforce simpler solemnisation, Ranjeet told PTI.

"Great importance should be assigned to the solemnisation of marriage between two individuals. But unfortunately, these days a tendency of celebrating marriages with pomp and show and spending lavishly growing in the country.

"These days, marriages are more about showing off your wealth and as a result, poor families are under tremendous social pressure to spend more. This is needed to be checked as it is not good for society at large," she said.

The Bill seeks that "if any family intends to spend more than Rs 5 lakh towards expenditure on marriage, such family shall declare the amount proposed to be spent in advance to the appropriate government and contribute 10 per cent of such amount in a welfare fund which shall be established by the appropriate government to assist the poor and Below Poverty Line families for the marriage of their daughters".

It says that after this proposed legislation comes into force, all marriages shall be registered within 60 days of the solemnisation.

The government may fix the limit of guests and relatives and number of dishes to be served to the guests and relatives for solemnisation of marriage or for the reception held thereafter as it may deem necessary or expedient to prevent the wastage of food items, it adds

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Aaron, Mangalore

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    Y not introduce a bill on honeymoon costs also.. Govt should also plan these kind of stupid ideas as they are in the trend of introducing /implementing stupid and flop plans.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kevin, Mangalore

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    Indian politicians scheme of new ways to get more bribes instead of solving the serious problem faced by Indians.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Katapadi/Frazer Town,Bangaluru

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    Good decision if adopted and implemented properly to save waste of money and to restore equality among the people

    DisAgree [5] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Pramod, Mangalore

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    I think this bill is unwanted and you can't involve somebody's personal life.
    It should be an individual decision depend upon his capacity and interest.
    According to me marriage is one time in his/her life and it's totally personal.
    If it's hard earned money and paying tax ,what is the issue?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rita, Germany

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    Idea and suggestion is good.But I dont think it will function as one want.Nowadays the costs are high,for example,in hindu weddings,groom wants a big amount of money and assets ,jewellary in as dowry.Brideparents have to meet their all wishes towards hall,special food as they want.otherwise they will just go back,many times it happened.when one has a big family,have to prepare too accordingly.Many people try to top the other marraige celebration.That is not good.I say celebrate the wedding as your budget allows ,whatever other say.Not too much ,but for your satisfactions and the other side too.stretch your legs as so long your mat is.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • JAGDISH, mumbai

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    MADAM,

    Now the time has changed...don't underline only Hindu wedding...go see in Muslim wedding how much they take and as well as others....just hate HINDUS that's it.

    DisAgree [18] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • SMR, Karkala

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    Many weddings are broken due to cash crunch announced by the PM Modi's central government. Some fathers even opted for suicide .

    That was the reality with common man of India. Whereas BJP leaders like bail from jail Janardhan Reddy, Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, Mahesh Sharma daughters big fat wedding went ahead in the mid of the 'demonetization'.

    If law of the land can't provide justice to common man why do we need such bills which is not applicable to super rich elites and political class?

    Jai Hind

    DisAgree [10] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Francis Aranha, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    There are diners who are spending more than 5 lakhs for a single dinner in elite hotels with expensive food and beverages such as liquors, champagne, wines, caviars, and lobsters and so on...therefore 5 lakhs budget for a marriage in these high inflation market is not fulfilling the ambitions of the people.

    DisAgree Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse

  • Allen, Mangaluru

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Good development! Instead of spending lavishly just to Show off use that hard earned money for the use of newly wedded couple for their future !

    DisAgree [7] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Evans Christopher Sumitra, Udupi/ New York, USA.

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Only a common man is targetted. in this kind of wedding. Rich people can spend lavishly on such extravagant weddings.

    DisAgree [11] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Why did they wait until Jaitley & Gadkari daughters wedding ...

    DisAgree [19] Agree [43] Reply Report Abuse

  • mahesh, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    ask congress party why did they wait? This is a private bill.
    Why didnt any congress guy think about this?

    DisAgree [23] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • krish, Dubai

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    they are waiting till Pappus wedding

    am sure congress will oppose the bill

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • joe Gonsalves, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Good idea. It is time that people stop spending lavishly on receptions. However the bill demanding 10% of the expenditure to help poor wedding receptions is not practical and not not workable.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • JOY CASTELINO, MOODUBELLE/DUBAI

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    If the Bill passed, then Ache Din for concerned government officials to harass & loot the public.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ruchir Agarwal, mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    HA ..... it wont work out all.Those who want to spend lavishly will take a bill below 5 lakhs other who spend 5 lakhs and above will be our politicians who will be least bothered about any law

    DisAgree [1] Agree [37] Reply Report Abuse

  • SHAM BHAT, mangaluru

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Most of the laws are for breaking.Most of the laws are not followed.If we cannot follow something dont make it a law

    DisAgree Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ruchir Agarwal, mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Mr Sham bhat ji all these laws apply only to the common man

    DisAgree [3] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Comman man's cash-in-hand is anyway restricted because of demonetisation and for some reason if he is seen spending more he is the first victim in the cruel and mighty hands of authorities. The rich, influentials and politicians will anyway get away without a scratch.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Elwyn Goveas, Valencia

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Can anyone suggest me about the liquor in fact my friends wedding is coming up in decemeber 17
    1. can a open bar is served.
    2.Or only 2 pegs should be served
    3. cheaper liqour or Premium whisky
    I am totally confused.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • J.F.D SOUZA, Mangalore. Attavar

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Dear Mr.Elwin, Whether you open a bar, whether you serve one or two pegs or full bottle to the guest it depends upon his /your capacity. Whether anyone serve cheaper whisky, premier whisky or scotch whisky it depends upon your financial capacity. But tell your friend not to exceed the expendituremore than five lakhs according to the newly introduced Act. Samje?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    No law applies to you if you are doing this within your house limits and property. It's your private and personal affair.

    DisAgree Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ruchir Agarwal, mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    One can also restrict the guests at about 200 people rather than calling the whole town

    DisAgree [6] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dylan, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Parents are to be blamed by allowing liquor for their children's wedding and wants to open a bar and later dance bar. Elwyn Goveas, Valencia why are you confused for your friends wedding. You will be confused after using the "BAR".

    DisAgree [5] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Melwin, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    If rich people not spending on their wedding, poor people will become more poor. Once expenditure or spending other persons income.

    DisAgree Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • J.F.D SOUZA, Mangalore. Attavar

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Why make pomp and show for the Wedding by spending extravagantly? Rs.5 lakhs are sufficient to celebrate wedding in a grand manner. Food is being wasted in many wedding celebrations. This needs to be checked. The introduction of this bill has come at a right time.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • RR, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    This is simply rubbish... Modiji participated in Nithin Gadkari's daughters marriage celebrated with lavish spending... Whether this rule applies to MPs MLAs ministers..? They can spend any amount..! No dearth of money. Everything for common man only..!

    DisAgree [11] Agree [37] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sooraj, Mangalore / Dubai

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Don't bring Modi into this. See who introduced this bill

    DisAgree [27] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ashok Salian, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Sooraj

    Tumein Mirchi Lagi toh main kya karun.. lolzzzz

    DisAgree [6] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • mahesh, Mangalore

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Are you having keriwal syndrome?for everything you point out to Modi.
    Luckily for him and unluckily for you, majority of indians support him.
    Orissa just had a major increase in voteshare in their panchayat elections for bjp.
    Burnol time ?

    DisAgree [6] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Lydia Lobo, Kadri

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Did Reddy take promise from the Parliamentarians that the bill will be presented after his daughter's wedding ?

    DisAgree [9] Agree [39] Reply Report Abuse

  • shan, dubai

    Wed, Feb 15 2017

    Reddy spent only 4,99,999.99 only

    DisAgree [3] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jacob Mendonsa, Melbourne/Australia

    Thu, Feb 16 2017

    Shan, I believe Jewellery presented by the father to the daughter was costing more than Crores of Rupees! DW readers please clarify whether donations, presents & gifts given by the parents r excluded from the total expenditure!

    DisAgree Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: No more extravagant wedding? Bill in LS seeks cap on guests



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.