Board recommended note ban after govt advice: RBI to Parliament panel


New Delhi, Jan 10 (PTI): Contrary to popular belief, it was the Government which had "advised" the Reserve Bank to junk Rs 500/1000 notes on November 7 and the board of the central bank the very next day recommended the demonetisation.

In a 7-page note to the Parliament's Department-Related Committee of Finance headed by Congress leader M Veerappa Moily, the RBI stated that the Government had on November 7, 2016 "advised the Reserve Bank that to mitigate the triple problems of counterfeiting, terrorist financing and black money, the Central Board of the Reserve Bank may consider withdrawal of the legal tender status of the notes in high denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000."

The RBI's Central Board met the very next day to "consider the Government's advice," and after "deliberations," decided to "recommend to Central Government that the legal tender status of the banknotes in the high denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 be withdrawn."

Union Cabinet headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi met within hours of that recommendation on November 8 and banned circulation of old 500 and 1000 rupee notes.
Some ministers have thus far maintained that the government had only acted on RBI recommendation of demonetisation.

In the note to the panel, RBI said it had been in the last few years working on introduction of new series of banknotes with improved security features to secure them against counterfeiting.

In parallel, the government had been taking steps to curb black money and combat terrorism. "There were reports by intelligence and enforcement agencies that availability of high denomination banknotes made it easier for black money hoarders and counterfeited notes in high denominations were being used for terrorist financing," RBI said.

"It occurred to Government of India and the Reserve Bank that the introduction of new series of notes could provide a very rare and profound opportunity to tackle all the three problems of counterfeiting, terrorist financing and black money by demonetising the banknotes in high denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 or by withdrawing legal tender status of such banknotes...

"Though no firm decision was taken initially, whether to demonetise or not, preparations still went on for introduction of new series notes, as that was needed in any case," the note said.

The central bank said it had as early as October 7, 2014 suggested to the government the need for introduction of 5,000 and 10,000 rupee notes, keeping in mind the inflation and the need for "facilitating payments and managing the currency logistics". The government, it said, concurred with the introduction of Rs 2000 notes on May 18, 2016.

RBI further said that it recommended to the government on May 27, 2016 that new series of bank notes with new designs, sizes, colors and themes including notes in the new Rs 2, 000 denomination be introduced.

"Government gave their final approval on June 7, 2016 and accordingly, the presses were advised in June 2016 to initiate production of new series notes.

"Since any new design notes or new denomination will catch the fancy of the public, it was decided that enough large quantities of Rs notes of 2,000 will be printed so that across the country such new notes can be issued simultaneously," it said.

Stating that when the stock of new notes printed was reaching a critical minimum, the decision to withdraw the legal tender could be made, RBI said the government, in its November 7 advice, mentioned that "cash has been a facilitator of black money since transactions made in cash do not leave any audit trail."

"Elimination of black money will eliminate the long shadow of the ghost economy and will be positive for India's growth outlook. They also observed that in the last 5 years, there has been an increase in the circulation of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes with an increasing incidence of counterfeiting of these notes," the Parliamentary panel was told.

"There have been widespread reports of the usage of FICN (Fake Indian Currency Note) for financing of terrorism and drug financing. The Fake Indian Currency Notes have their origin in neighboring country and pose a grievous threat to the security and integrity of the country. Hence the government has recommended that the withdrawal of the legal tender character" of 500 and 1000 rupee notes, it said.

In recommending demonetisation, the RBI board "observed that such a proposal could not have come at a more opportune time than coinciding with the introduction of the MG (New) series of notes. With these, the existing banknotes can be summarily withdrawn, and the new design notes with more counterfeit resistance features be introduced."

RBI said it might not have been immediately possible to replace these notes fully in terms of both value and volume on one to one basis, within a specific time.

"However, the stock of Rs 2000 denomination were arriving in RBI offices and were being dispatched to currency chests across the country and that could enable meeting a significant critical portion of the physical demand there from in value terms.

"Besides, electronic means of transaction were expected to take another part of the transaction load hitherto met from physical currency. Further, the available stock of other denominations at RBI and currency chests would also help meet demand," it said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues., Frazer Town,Bangalore

    Wed, Jan 11 2017

    Keeping the RBI in dark regarding this important decision not acceptable and unfortunate also.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • geoffrey, hat hill

    Tue, Jan 10 2017

    Whoever’s recommendation/decision it is, the damage is already made and it’ll be a long time before the normalcy resumes, if at all it does . In the meanwhile amidst all this furor and cacophony of unearthing black money, people have forgotten the REAL black money that is sitting in the overseas havens of which whatever is unearthed is a tiny fraction. Who knows? May be that was the very idea in the first place.

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rjcn, Mumbai/Mangalore

    Tue, Jan 10 2017

    As per the briefing given above the production of new notes viz.500 & 2016. Who was the RBI Governor in June 2016? Raghuram signature should have been there but you see the signature displayed on the new notes is that of Urgit Patel who was advisor to Reliance. Something funny.

    DisAgree Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Tue, Jan 10 2017

    This was bound to happen as govt is pushing down RBI's throat, RBI is pushing it back on govt. Prevoius govts and regimes have done this practice in legal, parliamentary and democratic way unlike BJP did it slyly by blowing the trumpet to the public of going after black money while safe guarding and hoarding its own ill gotten cash and illegal source of income.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • DR.S.Kamath, Mumbai

    Tue, Jan 10 2017

    Many people were talking that advise was given to PM by one Mr Anil Bokil of Artha kranti in Pune and then he acted on it .RBI recommeding was not in public forum
    any was whatever has been done is for good only.

    DisAgree [12] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D.,QC, mangalore/ottawa

    Tue, Jan 10 2017

    There you have it, crystal clear. A good and thorough report. If my memory serves me right, this is not the first time currency notes were withdrawn and replaced past governments, right after British Raj ended have done the same. Possibly RBI can enlighten us on this, to show whether it was a cabinet decision or parliament's decision to demonetize. This aspect seems to have been lost in all the furor that the current demonetization has created.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Board recommended note ban after govt advice: RBI to Parliament panel



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.