HC cuts Rs 7.85 lac from crash victim's compensation citing negligence, helmetless ride by rider


Daijiworld Media Network - Bengaluru

Bengaluru, Oct 20: In a significant ruling that underscores the legal consequences of road safety violations, the Karnataka High Court has reduced a compensation amount by Rs 7.85 lac, holding a deceased biker partly responsible for his own death due to riding without a helmet.

The court observed that Avinash (23), a resident of Chikkandavadi village in Holalkere taluk, Chitradurga district, who died in a road accident in 2019, had contributed to the fatal outcome through his own negligence. Although the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) had awarded Rs 18.03 lac in compensation to his family, the High Court revised the amount to Rs 11.78 lac, citing 40% contributory negligence on the part of the rider.

The accident occurred around 8:50 pm when Avinash was travelling by motorcycle from Hireguntanur to Adanur. Near Chikkajajur village, a tractor-trailer ahead of him reportedly braked suddenly without warning, causing his bike to crash into the rear of the trailer. Though he was rushed to hospital, he succumbed to his injuries en route. His father, Basarajappa, filed a claim with the MACT seeking compensation.

The tribunal found the tractor driver primarily at fault and directed the National Insurance Company, which insured the vehicle, to pay the amount along with 6% annual interest. The insurer appealed to the High Court in 2021, contesting both the quantum and liability, while Avinash’s mother filed a separate appeal seeking enhancement.

Delivering the verdict, the High Court bench led by Justice D K Singh noted: “The deceased was not wearing a helmet and was speeding. His negligence directly contributed to the severity of the accident and resulting fatality.” The bench concluded that 60% of the fault lay with the tractor driver, while 40% was attributable to Avinash.

Based on Avinash’s age, income, the financial dependency of his family, funeral costs, and potential future earnings, the court assessed a total compensation of Rs 19,64,400. Applying the 40% deduction, the revised amount stood at Rs 11,78,640, which the court ordered to be paid within six weeks, along with 6% interest per annum.

The incident highlights growing judicial emphasis on personal responsibility in road safety, particularly the use of helmets, which remains legally mandatory but is often overlooked.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Eulalia Dsouza, Bejai/ Mangalore

    Tue, Oct 21 2025

    It is a welcome move by the Court that Bike rider was at fault for not wearing his helmet at the time of the accident. So, if the accident victim dies of a bad road condition, will the NHAI pay better compensation to the victim because providing good roads if Govt & their responsibility. !! Or will the contractor be made to pay a compensation to these victims. Bikers need to be more cautious about their speed & style of riding bikes. Applying brakes is necessary when you maneuver a vehicle on the road. Vehicles behind need to be cautious and also keep safe distance.!!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sohrab, Karnataka

    Tue, Oct 21 2025

    ALL TRACTORS ON ROAD AND HIGHWAYS ARE WITHOUT WARNING LIGHT, WITHOUT LEFT TURN RIGHT TURN INDICATORS OR SIGNALS. DRIVING DANGEROUSLY TO ALL SHOULD BE PENALISED AND SEIZED. RC LISECE CANCELLED.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Raheja Waterfront

    Tue, Oct 21 2025

    We support Humanity ...

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Malinga, Kudla

    Tue, Oct 21 2025

    How can breaking on a road considered as a mistake? The tractor driver applied breaks that is all. It doesn't matter whether he stopped abruptly or slowly. What if someone jumps in front of your car, will you stop suddenly or will you check whether someone is behind your car before applying breaks? The HC sets precedent for ignoring the helmet use, at the same time sends a wrong message that ignoring a safe distance is okay!

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • J'roam K., Mangaluru

    Mon, Oct 20 2025

    Well it seems right 40% on rider....similarly what if fatal accodents on account of poor road conditions despite following all safety regulations on the part of the rider....

    DisAgree [1] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri_elder, Karkala

    Tue, Oct 21 2025

    If road condition is poor then simple rule: do not travel 😆

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: HC cuts Rs 7.85 lac from crash victim's compensation citing negligence, helmetless ride by rider



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.