Courts Rescue Wives in Distress

November 8, 2014

Cases of divorces and maintenance are not only becoming more frequent by the day but are also fiercely contested through the hierarchy of appeals from the family courts to the Supreme Court. The higher judiciary is quick to send a message on married life through their Solomon-like handling and colourful language of their judgments. Happily it is percolating to the lower judiciary as reflected in the judgment of a Delhi court as reported by Sana Shakil in The Times of India (28-10-14) and excerpted here.
Holidays in Switzerland and Nigeria, and possession of three cars by his family proved costly to a businessman as he failed to convince a trial court of his modest Rs 2.1 lakh annual income, which directed him to pay Rs 50,000 per month as interim maintenance to his estranged wife.

The court rejected the man's claim of being unable to pay the amount, terming his story unbelievable. "He maintains an account with HDFC Bank and went for his honeymoon to Switzerland, and even visited Nigeria. The version of respondent (man) that he travels to his workplace by public transport or with his brother is not believable, especially considering that three cars-Honda Civic 1.8, Hyundai Verna, Hyundai i20 Sports-are maintained by his parents and siblings and are registered in the name of their business run by them," Metropolitan Magistrate Snigdha Sharma said.

The court also expressed disappointment over the general practice of people not revealing their actual incomes to courts. Pointing out the need for eliminating such practices, the court said tax evasion has also become a norm in the country. "Unfortunately in India, parties do not truthfully reveal their income. Tax avoidance is the norm. Therefore, there cannot be mathematical exactitude in determining interim maintenance," the court said.

Holding that the man clearly earned Rs one lakh a month, the court said the woman was entitled to Rs 50,000 maintenance per month. To substantiate her claims that the man was earning much more than he revealed, the woman, in her plea said her husband did his MBA from England.

Yet another divorce/maintenance case where the higher judiciary upholds the lower judiciary order in favour of distressed dames comes from Mumbai. The Bombay High Court refused to interfere with an order of a lower court asking an industrialist to pay Rs one lakh monthly maintenance to his wife and two daughters and another sum of Rs 30,000 per month to them as rent towards accommodation.

A court in Vashi town in nearby Navi Mumbai had passed an interim order asking the industrialist to pay Rs 1.30 lakh to his estranged wife and children while hearing a domestic violence complaint filed by the wife. Justice M.L. Tahilyani said he also did not find anything wrong with an earlier order of a Delhi court asking the industrialist to pay Rs 20,000 per month to his wife and children as maintenance while hearing a divorce petition filed by him. The husband had challenged both the orders of the Navi Mumbai court as well as Delhi court. He argued that he was already paying Rs 20,000 per month to his estranged wife and children and therefore the Navi Mumbai court order asking him to pay the additional Rs 1.30 lakh was not justified.

“I do not find anything wrong in the orders of both the courts. As such these orders do not call for any interference,” the Judge remarked. However, he directed the trial magistrate in Navi Mumbai before whom the case filed by estranged wife is pending since last more than four years because of intervening proceedings to expeditiously decide it as soon as possible. The industrialist argued that the company in which he was a managing director had reduced his salary from Rs 24 lakh to Rs 6 lakh per annum. Hence, he had an income of Rs 50,000 per month and it was difficult for him to pay the Rs 1.30 lakh ordered by the Navi Mumbai court to his estranged wife.

His wife argued that he was a director of the company along with his brother and therefore it was easy for him to pass a resolution reducing his salary. He had done so to avoid making such payments ordered by the court to her, she alleged.

She argued that her husband was a director in as many as 10 companies and had enough income to pay her maintenance as ordered by the court.

Another recent instance of courts giving a leg up the weaker sex in matrimonial cases comes from Bangalore. A woman leaving her matrimonial house often to tend to her ailing mother cannot be considered as an act of cruelty against the husband, the Karnataka High Court said recently. The court was hearing an appeal from a man working in the film industry. The woman was expected to visit her mother suffering from ovarian cancer every now and then, a division bench comprising Justices KL Manjunath and AV Chandrashekara said adding: “Therefore, the act of respondent (wife) leaving the matrimonial house in order to go to her mother’s house often to look after her ailing mother cannot be considered as an aspect of cruelty.”

The bench dismissed a miscellaneous first appeal by the man challenging the December 12, 2012 verdict of the principal judge, family court, Bangalore. The family court had earlier dismissed the man’s application seeking dissolution of marriage on the grounds of desertion and cruelty. The family court had also chided the husband for filing divorce plea instead of being empathetic towards his wife. The high court said the evidence tendered by two neighbours goes to show that the wife stayed in her matrimonial house for more than one-and-a-half years. It also said the family court was right in observing that the amended application was an after-thought.

The Bangalore-based couple had married on November 3, 2006. Following differences with his wife, the husband, filed an application before the family court asking for divorce on the ground of desertion. After two years, he amended his application to include the allegation of cruelty also. His main allegation was that his wife often used to abuse him over his insufficient income and was frequently visiting her mother ignoring her duties as a wife.

The wife denied all his charges and claimed that she was forced to cook breakfast, lunch and dinner for over 15 people daily without the help of any assistant. She also claimed that her husband used to come home drunk late in the night and demanded money from her father to produce films.
The claims of men in such cases are rooted in their thinking that their wives are their property to do what they want with them. This ownership aspect is nothing new as reflected in the following passage from William Shakespeare, English dramatic poet (1564-1616) in Taming the Shrew:

I will be master of what is mine own;
She is my goods, my chattels, she is my house,
My household stuff, my field, my barn,
My horse, my ox, my ass, my anything;
And here she stands, touch her whoever dare.

Author and journalist, John Monteiro’s latest book, Corruption - India’s Painful Crawl to Lokpal, published in USA and priced at $21.5, is available online from Amazon and other major online distributors.
By John B Monteiro
To submit your article / poem / short story to Daijiworld, please email it to mentioning 'Article/poem submission for daijiworld' in the subject line. Please note the following:

  • The article / poem / short story should be original and previously unpublished in other websites except in the personal blog of the author. We will cross-check the originality of the article, and if found to be copied from another source in whole or in parts without appropriate acknowledgment, the submission will be rejected.
  • The author of the poem / article / short story should include a brief self-introduction limited to 500 characters and his/her recent picture (optional). Pictures relevant to the article may also be sent (optional), provided they are not bound by copyright. Travelogues should be sent along with relevant pictures not sourced from the Internet. Travelogues without relevant pictures will be rejected.
  • In case of a short story / article, the write-up should be at least one-and-a-half pages in word document in Times New Roman font 12 (or, about 700-800 words). Contributors are requested to keep their write-ups limited to a maximum of four pages. Longer write-ups may be sent in parts to publish in installments. Each installment should be sent within a week of the previous installment. A single poem sent for publication should be at least 3/4th of a page in length. Multiple short poems may be submitted for single publication.
  • All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format or text file. Pictures should not be larger than 1000 pixels in width, and of good resolution. Pictures should be attached separately in the mail and may be numbered if the author wants them to be placed in order.
  • Submission of the article / poem / short story does not automatically entail that it would be published. Daijiworld editors will examine each submission and decide on its acceptance/rejection purely based on merit.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to edit the submission if necessary for grammar and spelling, without compromising on the author's tone and message.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to reject submissions without prior notice. Mails/calls on the status of the submission will not be entertained. Contributors are requested to be patient.
  • The article / poem / short story should not be targeted directly or indirectly at any individual/group/community. Daijiworld will not assume responsibility for factual errors in the submission.
  • Once accepted, the article / poem / short story will be published as and when we have space. Publication may take up to four weeks from the date of submission of the write-up, depending on the number of submissions we receive. No author will be published twice in succession or twice within a fortnight.
  • Time-bound articles (example, on Mother's Day) should be sent at least a week in advance. Please specify the occasion as well as the date on which you would like it published while sending the write-up.

Comment on this article

  • Jennet Prescilla, Mangalore Muscat

    Thu, Nov 13 2014

    only one epithet in abbreviation M C P on this view of Roshan Braganza

  • Dominic Frank Ravio, Panji

    Sun, Nov 09 2014

    In present society younger generation (family) is experiencing ( may be with exception author of this article) a discrimination weaker sex and has become now dominating sex, 60-40 to due various factors. Therefore, laws should be evolved around this revolving, evolving factor.

  • Aditi, Indore

    Sun, Nov 09 2014

    There should be equality in the law if Wife is earning more than Husband or Husband is earning enough to meet his expenses at the age of 50 plus and wife is earning much more and living lavish life than it's the duty of the judges to order the Wife to pay Maintenance to her husband as he also have the equal rights according to law to live the equal standard of life as wife lives than only we can say the law is equal for all.

  • Lancy M Pinto, Mangalore/Doha

    Sat, Nov 08 2014

    Roshan instead of using and disposing women, let us keep away from them and live in a desert and let our lives be deserted. Most women need to count their blessings, be realistic, honour and respect relationships, do not put too much weight on social status else living in desert is the best option. Marriage is a partnership supposed to be bonded in love, caring, sharing, compromise... than be egoistic, self centered and revengeful in every word and action. Peace, joy, contentment... are priceless and cannot be weighed by wealth. Basic trait of women is to gather and men hunt. Genetically: women have diverse view as gatherers and men focussed view as hunters. Generally, men need to make sense in what they do and can never win arguments with women. Time to time men need to keep silent and allow women to release their frustrations within acceptable parameters. Two way communication is best to resolve issues. Better not to start anything like marriage if we cannot end it well for both especially innocent children. Live and let live peacefully and hopefully enjoy each other's life till the end.

  • Sudhi, byndoor

    Sat, Nov 08 2014

    I really agree with you. It has become very common to blame husband for everything. Earlier it was women who suffered in the hands of men. Now it is vice versa. If unemployed husband claim compensation every one will make fun and blame him. But if wife claim compensation then nobody blames her. 15 to 20 years back very few women were working outside. But now trend has changed. Women are earning more than the men which is not at all considered. Divorce means they are no longer husband and wife, then why should only husband share his hard money with his ex-wife. Few women are harassed by few men doesn't mean that all women are harassed. What about those men who are being harassed not only in home but even in office. If men go against them then they will complain that his way of looking at me is not proper or that he misbehaved me etc. They are so much wrongly inspired by most of the news (about sexual harassment/rapes etc.) that they see all men in the same way. How can women expect good deeds from men when their thinking about men his not changed. Kindly note that my comment is only against those who misuse the law not against all. And my comment for men is only those who has suffered in the hands of women and not those few bad men.

  • Roshan Braganza, Mumbai

    Sat, Nov 08 2014

    I find the above article extremely feminist nature , that very well comes in the category of White Knights ( Male Feminist ) . Its very biased against men and surprisingly depicts only one side of story.

    1. If Equality is a buzz word , then why divorced women have to be paid money , why can't she support herself ?!

    2. Its the husbands hard earned money and property , why he has to share this with someone who is not part of his life anymore.

    3. If any alimony is given to wife , shouldn't it b equal to potential of women , rather than husband !!?.

    As more and more , wives misusing laws and dragging husbands to court for money , its a day robbery going exponential. So far Hindu Marriage Act is worse and Muslim personal laws.r so far ok ( gives more rights to men )

    Also there r lot of brave men , who prefer to go Jail , rather than giving money to their ' lazy' wives. So far men should b very safe and do not reveal the assets they have , this looks like a safe bet.


Leave a Comment

Title: Courts Rescue Wives in Distress

You have 2000 characters left.


Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will be held responsible.