Bangalore: HC Judge Refuses to Hear Bail Plea of Atul


Daijiworld Media Network - Bangalore (SP)

Bangalore, Aug 27: A High Court judge, to whom the bail petition moved by Atul Rao, prime accused in the case pertaining to the disappearance and subsequent death of Padmapriya, wife of Udupi MLA K Raghupati Bhat, was referred, has refused to hear the same. It may be recalled that Atul, who used to be a close friend and confidante of the MLA, is charged with having been involved in the case.

The Judge in question, Justice Mohana Shantana Gowder however, did not assign any reasons for his refusal to hear the case.  He referred the petition back to the Chief Justice, for being placed before some other bench.

Atul Rao was arrested by the Manipal police, acting on a complaint filed by Raghupati Bhat. The police have filed chargesheet against him, accusing him of masterminding the kidnap of Padmapriya.

The state government has filed its objections to the bail petition, claiming that the investigations by the police and Corps of Detectives have found Atul's active involvement in kidnapping Padmapriya and taking her to Delhi. In the course, he is also charged with duping the Goa police.

The government said that Atul Rao had abducted Padmapriya from Kunjarugiri Hills on June 12, 2008. She was taken to Goa by road and then to Delhi by flight. He replaced photograph of his wife with that of Padmapriya with the intention of duping the Goa police to make them believe that the lady travelling with him by air is in fact, his own wife, the prosecution has said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Swati,

    Wed, Aug 27 2008

    Padma's dead and Atul is being killed in the prison. If all that is said above reagrding Atul's involvement is true, he should be punished but ... it sounds more to the surface water. Can an abducted lady travel so freely (with jeans) with a man who is not her huband? Atul was not with her in Delhi all the while she was there could she not make a call to her husband?

    What about the application she had wittten to find a job in Delhi? Has Atul been given an opportunity to express himself? Does the law in his case takes its own course or it is being 'hijacked' in favor of Bhat? With these and more questions, the reader and the public is left in suspecion. Can truth pravail in this case?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Balakrishna Shetty, Yellur, Udupi/Dubai

    Wed, Aug 27 2008

    Steven, you should ask this question to the nearest and dearest of Padmapriya. Did you lose any in this manner?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • STEVEN, UDUPI

    Wed, Aug 27 2008

    Mr. Balakrishna Shetty when compared to other countries we should be happy that we live in India. i cannot understand why too much is made of this particular case.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Balakrishna Shetty, Yellur, Udupi/Dubai

    Wed, Aug 27 2008

    I think the larger question is who killed Padmapriya? If it is suicide or accidental death why is the New Delhi police not in picture? How could the body be brought from New Delhi so quickly? Who is protecting whom? Why police cannot come out with truth? Whom are they worried about? Are citizen safe enough in this country?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bangalore: HC Judge Refuses to Hear Bail Plea of Atul



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.