Ex-Kingfisher Airlines official gets 18-month jail in cheque bounce cases


Hyderabad, Sep 22 (PTI) : Former Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the grounded carrier Kingfisher Airlines Ltd, A Raghunathan, was today sentenced to 18-month imprisonment by a court here in connection with two cheque bounce cases filed against him and businessman Vijay Mallya by GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd.

Third Special Court Magistrate M Krishna Rao also imposed Rs 20,000 fine in each case on Raghunathan after the latter appeared before the court.

Earlier, on several occasions, the order on quantum of punishment had got adjourned as the warrant issued against Raghunathan was still pending.

The court had on April 20 convicted Kingfisher Airlines, Mallya and Raghunathan, in connection with two cheque bounce cases involving Rs 50 lakh each, under relevant sections of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

The matter relates to cheques issued by Kingfisher Airlines Ltd to GMR Hyderabad International Airport Ltd (GHIAL), which operates Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, towards charges for using the facilities at the airport for Kingfisher Airlines flights.

During arguments today, GHIAL counsel G Ashok Reddy submitted that it was after five months that Raghunathan had finally appeared before this court.

He further informed that Vijay Mallya is absconding and is out of the country, and sought a court direction to proceed with sentence order against Raghunathan.

The magistrate told Raghunathan that he has been found guilty under relevant sections of Negotiable Instruments Act.

Raghunathan submitted before the court "I was only an employee of United Spirits Limited. I was on rolls of United Spirits. My services seconded to Kingfisher Airlines Limited. I was always an employee of United Spirits and retired in July 2013."

The magistrate, in his order, sentenced Raghunathan to undergo one year and six months imprisonment and also imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 in each case.

The magistrate further said Raghunathan can file appeal against the judgement of this court in the case after which his counsel moved a petition and the court allowed the plea suspending its order till October 19 enabling Raghunathan to go for an appeal and asked him to furnish two sureties of Rs 10,000 each towards bails bonds.

The court had earlier issued non-bailable warrants against Kingfisher Airlines, its chairman Mallya and Raghunathan on the ground of dishonouring the two cheques.

It had earlier said that before imposing the quantum of punishment, it would hear the plea of the convicts (Mallya and others, who had so far not appeared/attended the court), and then pass its order with regard to sentencing and imposing fine.

Raghunathan's counsel today sought for splitting the case against his client. However, the court did not agree for it.

Raghunathan had appeared before other courts here in the past few days in connection with NBWs issued against him after he had moved the High Court, and got the warrants recalled.

Ashok Reddy argued that the High Court in its order (for recall of NBWs) had "made it clear that its order will not stand in way when the matter reached at the stage of judgement, pronouncement of sentence or conviction of the accused in the case."

Ashok Reddy, citing certain court rulings, further submitted that this court can pass sentence against the company and also against Vijay Mallya.

"One of the accused is present in the court and the court is requested to also sentence Kingfisher Airlines and Vijay Mallya, to avoid delay. Notwithstanding absence of Vijay Mallya, the court can sentence and impose fine against Vijay Mallya," Reddy submitted.

"Entire country knows where he (Mallya) is staying...he may not come back. It will take years to bring him back to India. At least fine can be imposed against the company," he said.

However, as the warrants against the Company and Mallya had returned unserved, the court directed the complainant (GHIAL) to file their present correct address and posted the matter to October 18.

As per the GMR counsel, a total of 17 cases have been filed against Kingfisher Airlines in different courts over outstanding amount of Rs 22.5 crore, which it owes to GMR.

The cases are in different stages of trial.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues., Frazer Town,Bangalore

    Fri, Sep 23 2016

    This is the legal compliance which no body can object because the issue is of cheque bounce

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • sudhi, byndoor

    Fri, Sep 23 2016

    As far as my knowledge is concerned the complainant has to prove that the accused issued the cheque on his behalf for his own benefit or purpose. Here he issued cheque on behalf of the company and for the company. Then how can he be punished. Strange. In the appeal definitely he is going to be acquitted.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Sep 23 2016

    Punish Vijay Mallya ...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Grashon, kinnigoli, Dubai

    Fri, Sep 23 2016

    Wahh
    Owner if roaming freely with 9000 crores and employee will be going jail for 50 lakh for same Airlines. This happens only in India. Achey din for loan defaulter

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri, Karkala

    Fri, Sep 23 2016

    This is very unfair..

    DisAgree [2] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Ex-Kingfisher Airlines official gets 18-month jail in cheque bounce cases



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.