SC seeks police's response on threat to lawyer in Sabarimala temple case


New Delhi, Jan 19 (IANS) : The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Delhi Police commissioner to apprise it of steps taken by police on the complaint filed by Indian Young Lawyers Association (IYLA) about the threats being given to its president for raising the issue of Kerala's Sabarimala temple not allowing the entry of women aged between 10 and 50.

A bench of Justice Dipak Misra, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh and Justice N.V.Ramana, while seeking the response, said: "We direct the commissioner of police to see that the attempts of this nature are crippled in the beginning."

Noting that president of the petitioner IYLA has been provided with security, the court in its order said, "The commissioner of police shall take stock of the situation and see to it that no harm is caused to the aggrieved person."

On a PIL by the IYLA, the apex court on January 11 had said that unless a temple had a constitutional right, it could not prohibit the entry of the women pilgrims to offer worship.

Referring to the plea by the petitioner about the threats being given to its president, the court said: "If they are true, they would definitely have the strength to create a dent in the fundamental concept of Rule of Law which is sacrosanct in a democratic body polity."

"Access to justice cannot be dented by any authority or any person. It can only be controlled by a court of law within the parameters of law. Individual whim or fancy or perception has no room," the court said in its order.

Directing the further hearing on the application on February 8 when the main matter is listed for hearing, the court said that the thrust of the PIL by the IYLA was whether women within the age group of 10 to 50 should be allowed to enter into Sabarimala temple or not, and the matter would be determined in due course of the hearing.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Promenade Road,Fraze Town,B'lore 560005

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    Hope the Police Department will appraise the action taken in the matter to the Supreme Court without any delay

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    DON'T UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF WOMEN ...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Krish, Dubai

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    Your earlier comments on
    news: "FIR against actor Nawazuddin Siddiqui for assaulting woman"
    comments:"Thank God she did not tear her dress and cry RAPE ..."

    intention in both comments are completely opposite to each.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    Krish,
    Thank you for taking a keen interest in my writings.
    I am IMPRESSED ...

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Krish, Dubai

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    Dear Mr. Jossey,
    No need to impress by my comments. If possible At least "IMPROVE" yourself.

    DisAgree Agree Report Abuse

  • Krish, Dubai

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    I hope your next comments will be "I am IMPROVED ..." instead of "I am IMPRESSED ..."

    DisAgree Agree Report Abuse

  • Mohammed Akthar , jeddah/mlore

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    Don't poke your nose into others issues.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Santan Mascarenhas, Kinnigoli/Mumbai

    Tue, Jan 19 2016

    Like this temple case, there is one of Haji Ali in Mumbai, where Muslim women filed a case in Bombay HC. The HC is waiting for direction from SC on temple and will decide on Haji Ali, as per press release.

    DisAgree Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: SC seeks police's response on threat to lawyer in Sabarimala temple case



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.