Babri case: Court rejects newspaper reports and cassettes as evidence


New Delhi, Sep 30 (IANS): A Special CBI court hearing the Babri mosque demolition case of December 6, 1992, acquitted all the 32 accused on Wednesday saying it was spontaneous and not a planned move.

In the verdict, special CBI judge S.K. Yadav observed that the evidence against the accused was based on newspaper reports.

Those acquitted in the case that lasted 28 years include former Deputy Prime Minister L.K. Advani, former Union Ministers M.M. Joshi, Uma Bharti, former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Kalyan Singh and Mahant Nritya Gopal Das, among others.

The verdict came less than a year after the Supreme Court verdict in the Ayodhya title dispute, which paved the way for the construction of a Ram temple at the Ayodhya site.

In the 2300-page order, the court concluded that the authenticity of audio, video provided by the CBI could not be established during the trial, and the audio of the speeches, placed on record as evidence, were not clear.

The court noted that it could not be established whether one of cassettes, marked in the seizure memo, in somebody's custody, was sealed or open?

The CBI produced 351 witnesses and 600 documents as evidence before the court and charges were framed against 48 people. Of these 16 died during the course of the trial.

The court said all the evidence has been reviewed and the charge against the accused could not be proved.

The court noted that the accused wanted to save the structure as Ram Lalla statues were inside, and the leaders who were present on the dais made several attempts to persuade the 'kar sewaks' from pulling down the structure. The court noted lakhs of kar sewaks reached the disputed site and the police could not control them.

The court observed the people who pulled down the Babri mosque were "anti-national elements". In the Ayodhya verdict the apex court had called the demolition of the mosque a violation of the rule of law.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Indian, Sharjah

    Fri, Oct 02 2020

    Were there high definition cameras and smart phones in the nineties?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • PenMightierThanTheSword!, Mangalore

    Thu, Oct 01 2020

    Murder someone — say it was spontaneous and not planned!

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Abdul Shereef, Maikala

    Thu, Oct 01 2020

    Only when we hear some judgments we understand how poor and low level is our thinking and brain capacity. Only verdicts like Ayodhya and Babri mosque demolition makes us to understand how advanced and reasonable is our court's thinking.


    All these years it was claimed that Karasevaks backed by Sangh Parivar and BJP have demolished the structure. They celebrated Dec 6th as Vijay divas. BJP rose from 2 seats to majority. Now that court said, it was not Karsevaks, but some uncultured people in he gathering demolished the structure and the sangh parivar welcomed the verdict, we understand that Vijay divas was a sham, BJP rose from 2 seats to majority on lies.
    It would have been graceful if the people who took credit for the demolition condemned the verdict!

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • AMAR NATHAL, MANGALORE

    Thu, Oct 01 2020

    There was a big storm and the mosque came crumbling down.

    Thousands of people came rushing to see the devastation but they were falsely accused as perpetrators who demolition the mosque.

    But the court found out that no one is guilty of the crime of destructive act. Chapter closed. Next lesson tomorrow, online.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, India

    Thu, Oct 01 2020

    Uma bharti, pragya, advani, mm joshi ask people to demolish babri masjid but court says NO, you didn’t... in Bangalore riots pfi leaders ask people to co-operate with police, but court says NO, you encouraged people to burn vehicles and houses...

    if courts dont accepts videos and audio clip as proof, then on what basis police arrested people in bangalore and delhi?? Is there any different laws for govt supporters and oppositions??

    DisAgree Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Concerned citizen, Mangaluru

    Thu, Oct 01 2020

    Democracy of india under the dens of murderes

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Babri case: Court rejects newspaper reports and cassettes as evidence



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.