No one must interfere with Sabarimala temple traditions, says Rajinikanth


Chennai, Oct 20(PTI): Actor Rajinikanth on Saturday said there should be no "interference" in temple traditions being followed for a long time, in his first response to the recent Supreme Court order on the entry of women of all age groups into the Sabarimala shrine in Kerala and the subsequent protests.

Speaking to reporters here, he said there was no second opinion on equality for women in every sphere. "But when you talk about a temple, every temple has its time-honoured rituals, besides traditions being followed for a long time. My humble opinion is that no one should interfere in that," Rajinikanth said.

Noting that the top court verdict should be "respected", the 67-year-old actor, however, indicated that caution should be exercised when it came to matters of religion and related rituals.

Kerala has been witnessing protests against the entry of girls and women of menstrual age into Sabarimala temple since the government had said it would abide by the ruling of the apex court.

The agitation intensified since the shrine was opened for the five-day monthly pooja on October 17. On September 28, a five-judge Constitution bench of the SC, headed by then chief justice Dipak Misra, lifted the centuries-old ban on the entry of women of menstrual age into the shrine.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • SMR, Karkala

    Sun, Oct 21 2018

    The Supreme Court, in a historic decision this year struck down a rule that disallowed girls and women in the age group of 10 to 50 years from entering the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. Headed by the then Chief Justice, Dipak Misra, the Constitution bench of five judges in a 4-1 verdict said the temple rule violated women’s right to equality and the right to worship.

    It is worth mentioning that the Constitution of India considers “freedom of religion” as a fundamental right guaranteed by Article 25-28 of the Constitution. “In the eyes of the Constitution men and women both are equal, but there are certain groups who do not want equality in the society.”

    1. Actor Rajinikanth statement is contempt of the court. Is his new political party is allying with BJP-RSS playing dirty politics?
    2. Is Rajinikanth thinks he is above the law of the land?
    3. Why the Supreme Court can't ask for his arrest?

    Jai Hind

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Fayaz, Mangalore /Dubai

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    But y if woman is a goddes in Hinduism then y double standard
    Let them also go and get blessed
    Did ayyapa told any time womans are not allowed
    Or should not come to meet him
    The birth of you people is given by woman

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Pnto, Mnglre

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Say no women should watch any of ur films. Praying to a deity is one's right n sc has rightly upheld it.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Amith, NAGPUR

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Another FEKU Bhakt fishing in the troubled water in favour of Pakoda Chef "Fekendranath Juumladas Modi" !!!! What is the knowledge of a Bus Conducter other than pocketing the money without issuing the ticket!!!!!

    DisAgree [6] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • anthony, Mangalore

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    The Supreme Court has been deliberating this case since 2006 and the Judgement passed on 22nd Sep by a division bench of five Supreme Court consisting of five Judges including the Chief Justice should be respected. Those who feel aggreived with the Judgement should have joined as respondents during this long period between 2006 and 2018 or seek redressal now by filing a review petition instead of exploiting the situation for narrow political gains.

    Rajanikant is playing safe by pleasing all.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Manohar, Mangalore

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Anna is not a chief justice of india. He is a common citizen.
    His opinion is limited to his ability to understand the things.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Moshu, Mangaluru

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Similary the rule must apply even in the case of Ayodhya verdict where the SC’s decision on Mosques not being integral part of Islam which is totally untrue. According to Islam, its holy scriptures did mention the dignificance of mosque.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    This jobless wants to challenge supreme court .

    DisAgree [10] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Moshu, Mangaluru

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Correction: significance

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Moshu, Mangaluru

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Before leaving his post, Deepak Misra, a historical controversial CJI, whose working approach recently were questioned by 4 senior judges once again did favor central govt with his controversial judgement which might gain BJP in the upcomming Loka sabha polls.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    No one is above Supreme Court ...

    DisAgree [9] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • j.anata, Mangaluru / Bengaluru

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Same SC of India has reversed many decisions, one such was Jallikkattu

    DisAgree [9] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • KRPrabhu, Mangalore/Bangalore

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Except Shah Banu...

    DisAgree [5] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Eric Coelho, Mangalore

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    If this is statement, I feel people should stop watching his movies. Temple is for all sex. God is for all. So stop making senseless statement.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • PEDDA GUNDOO, MANGALURU

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Rajni said it correctly !

    DisAgree [8] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangaluru

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    Ippo anna sonnar.
    Purinjidaa? inimudal vaayi moodi irikkunu.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • prakash, kundapur

    Sat, Oct 20 2018

    jai ho thalaiva

    DisAgree [10] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: No one must interfere with Sabarimala temple traditions, says Rajinikanth



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.